Single logo

Faculty Development and Performance Audit Checklist

A comprehensive audit checklist for evaluating and improving faculty development processes and performance in educational institutions, ensuring alignment with ISO 21001:2018 standards and best practices in academic staff management.

Faculty Development and Performance Audit Checklist
by: audit-now
4.2

Get Template

About This Checklist

The Faculty Development and Performance Audit Checklist is an essential tool for educational institutions committed to maintaining high standards of teaching excellence and professional growth among their faculty. Aligned with ISO 21001:2018 standards, this comprehensive checklist focuses on evaluating and enhancing faculty performance, continuous professional development, and teaching effectiveness. It addresses the critical need for institutions to support their educators in adapting to evolving pedagogical approaches, technological advancements, and diverse student needs. By implementing this audit process, educational organizations can foster a culture of continuous improvement, ensure high-quality instruction, and ultimately enhance student learning outcomes. This checklist serves as a cornerstone for maintaining educational excellence and preparing faculty to meet the challenges of modern education.

Learn more

Industry

Education

Standard

ISO 21001:2018

Workspaces

Educational Institutions

Occupations

Academic Dean
Faculty Development Coordinator
Human Resources Manager in Education
Department Chair
Teaching Excellence Officer

Faculty Development Assessment

(0 / 4)

1
How would you rate the overall teaching excellence of the faculty?

Select a rating from the list.

To evaluate the quality of teaching based on peer or student feedback.
2
Please provide feedback on the effectiveness of the faculty's teaching methods.

Provide detailed feedback.

To gather qualitative insights on teaching effectiveness.
Write something awesome...
3
How many hours of professional development has the faculty completed in the past year?

Enter the number of hours.

To assess the commitment to continuous professional growth.
Min: 0
Target: 20
Max: 100
4
Is the faculty's teaching performance compliant with ISO 21001 standards?

Select the compliance status.

To ensure adherence to quality standards in teaching practices.
5
How innovative are the faculty's teaching practices?

Select a rating from the list.

To evaluate the creativity and effectiveness of teaching methodologies.
6
What are the faculty's professional development goals for the upcoming year?

List the goals.

To understand the faculty's commitment to continuous improvement.
7
What is the average student feedback score for the faculty's courses?

Enter the average feedback score (1-5).

To assess student satisfaction and teaching effectiveness.
Min: 1
Target: 4
Max: 5
8
Is the faculty's curriculum development aligned with ISO 21001:2018 standards?

Select the compliance status.

To verify compliance with established curriculum development standards.
9
How would you rate the level of student engagement in the faculty's classes?

Select a rating from the list.

To assess how effectively the faculty engages students in the learning process.
10
What are the identified strengths and weaknesses of the faculty's teaching?

Provide detailed strengths and weaknesses.

To provide a comprehensive analysis of teaching performance.
Write something awesome...
11
What is the peer review score assigned to the faculty's teaching performance?

Enter the peer review score (1-5).

To evaluate the faculty's effectiveness based on peer evaluations.
Min: 1
Target: 4
Max: 5
12
Are the assessment methods used by the faculty compliant with ISO 21001:2018 standards?

Select the compliance status.

To ensure assessment methods meet quality assurance standards.
13
How effective are the faculty's methods in achieving student learning outcomes?

Select a rating from the list.

To evaluate the impact of teaching methods on student success.
14
Describe any innovative practices the faculty has implemented in their teaching.

Provide a description of innovative practices.

To assess the faculty's creativity and adaptability in teaching.
15
How many professional development activities has the faculty participated in this year?

Enter the number of activities.

To measure the faculty's engagement in ongoing professional development.
Min: 0
Target: 5
Max: 20
16
Does the faculty's teaching strategy align with ISO 21001:2018 standards?

Select the compliance status.

To verify that teaching strategies adhere to recognized quality standards.
17
How effective are the assessment methods used by the faculty in measuring student learning?

Select a rating from the list.

To assess the validity and reliability of assessment practices.
18
What initiatives has the faculty taken to enhance their professional development?

Detail the initiatives.

To understand proactive measures taken for faculty improvement.
Write something awesome...
19
How many teaching workshops has the faculty attended in the past year?

Enter the number of workshops.

To evaluate the faculty's commitment to improving teaching skills.
Min: 0
Target: 3
Max: 15
20
Is the faculty's course design in compliance with ISO 21001:2018 standards?

Select the compliance status.

To ensure that course designs meet established educational quality standards.

FAQs

The checklist covers areas such as teaching effectiveness, research and scholarly activities, professional development opportunities, pedagogical innovation, student feedback mechanisms, and alignment with institutional objectives and ISO 21001 standards.

It ensures that faculty development and performance evaluation processes align with ISO 21001's focus on continuous improvement, learner-centered approaches, and the enhancement of educational service quality through competent and well-supported educators.

The audit should involve academic leadership, department heads, human resources professionals, faculty representatives, and potentially external education experts to ensure a comprehensive and unbiased evaluation.

It's recommended to conduct a comprehensive audit annually, with ongoing monitoring and smaller-scale reviews throughout the academic year to address immediate development needs and performance improvements.

Outcomes may include improved teaching quality, enhanced faculty satisfaction and retention, more targeted professional development programs, better alignment of faculty skills with institutional goals, and ultimately, improved student learning outcomes and satisfaction.

Benefits

Ensures systematic evaluation of faculty performance and development needs

Promotes continuous professional growth and teaching excellence

Aligns faculty development with institutional goals and ISO 21001 standards

Enhances the quality of instruction and student learning experiences

Supports data-driven decision-making in faculty management and resource allocation