Single logo
LoginSign Up

SAE AS5553 Test Laboratory Evaluation Checklist

This checklist is designed to evaluate and qualify test laboratories involved in counterfeit electronic part detection and analysis, ensuring compliance with the SAE AS5553 standard for the aerospace and defense industry.

SAE AS5553 Test Laboratory Evaluation Checklist

by: audit-now
4.5

Get Template

About This Checklist

The SAE AS5553 Test Laboratory Evaluation Checklist is an essential tool for aerospace and defense industry professionals to assess and qualify laboratories involved in the detection and analysis of counterfeit electronic parts. This comprehensive checklist aligns with the SAE AS5553 standard, focusing on the capabilities, procedures, and quality management systems of test laboratories. By implementing this checklist, organizations can ensure they partner with competent laboratories, enhancing their ability to detect counterfeit components and maintain compliance with industry regulations.

Learn more

Industry

Aerospace and Defense

Standard

SAE AS5553 - Counterfeit Electronic Parts Prevention

Workspaces

Quality control facilities
Supplier premises
Laboratories

Occupations

Quality Assurance Manager
Laboratory Auditor
Test Engineer
Procurement Specialist
Compliance Officer

1
Is the laboratory accredited by a recognized body?

Select the accreditation status.

To ensure that the laboratory meets quality standards and is recognized for its competence.
2
What is the score for the test method validation (0-100)?

Enter a value between 0 and 100.

To assess the effectiveness of the test methods employed by the laboratory.
Min: 0
Target: 80
Max: 100
3
Describe the procedure for measurement traceability used in the laboratory.

Provide a detailed description.

To verify that measurements can be traced to national or international standards.
4
Are procedures in place for counterfeit detection?

Select the status of counterfeit detection procedures.

To ensure that the laboratory can identify and manage counterfeit parts effectively.
5
When was the last accreditation review conducted?

Select the date of the last review.

To ensure timely reviews of the laboratory's accreditation status.
6
Detail the quality assurance practices implemented in the laboratory.

Provide a comprehensive overview.

To evaluate the laboratory's commitment to maintaining high-quality standards.

7
Is the test method compliant with SAE AS5553 requirements?

Select compliance status.

To ensure that the testing methods used meet industry standards and regulatory requirements.
8
What is the repeatability measurement value (in percentage)?

Enter a percentage value.

To assess the consistency of the test method results over repeated trials.
Min: 0
Target: 95
Max: 100
9
Describe the calibration procedure for the equipment used in testing.

Provide details of the calibration procedure.

To ensure that all testing equipment is properly calibrated for accurate results.
10
When was the last validation of the test method conducted?

Select the date of the last validation.

To ensure regular validation of testing methods to maintain accuracy and reliability.
11
Is the test equipment regularly maintained?

Select the maintenance status.

To confirm that the equipment is maintained to avoid inaccuracies in testing.
12
Describe any anomalies observed in the test results.

Provide a detailed description of any anomalies.

To document any issues that may affect the integrity of test results.

13
Is there a documented quality control process in place?

Select the status of the quality control process.

To ensure that the laboratory has established procedures to maintain quality standards.
14
What is the current non-conformance rate (in percentage)?

Enter a percentage value.

To monitor the frequency of non-conformances and ensure quality improvement.
Min: 0
Target: 5
Max: 100
15
Detail the corrective action procedures for addressing non-conformances.

Provide a detailed description of corrective actions.

To ensure that there are clear procedures to address and rectify quality issues.
16
When was the last quality audit conducted?

Select the date of the last audit.

To verify that regular audits are performed to assess quality standards.
17
Describe the training records for personnel involved in quality control.

Provide an overview of training records.

To ensure that all personnel are adequately trained in quality control processes.
18
How often are internal reviews conducted?

Select the frequency of internal reviews.

To assess the frequency of internal reviews for continuous quality improvement.

19
Does the supplier hold any quality certifications (e.g., ISO 9001)?

Select the certification status.

To ensure that the supplier adheres to recognized quality standards.
20
Describe the supplier's quality improvement plan.

Provide a detailed description of the improvement plan.

To evaluate the supplier's commitment to continuous quality improvement.
21
What is the defect rate of products received from the supplier (in percentage)?

Enter a percentage value.

To assess the quality of products supplied and identify areas for improvement.
Min: 0
Target: 2
Max: 100
22
When was the last audit of the supplier conducted?

Select the date of the last audit.

To verify that supplier audits are carried out regularly to ensure compliance.
23
Is there a corrective action process in place for addressing supplier issues?

Select the status of the corrective action process.

To ensure that there are procedures for resolving quality-related issues with the supplier.
24
Provide comments regarding the supplier's performance over the last evaluation period.

Enter any relevant comments.

To document qualitative assessments of the supplier's performance.

25
Is the material provided certified by a recognized authority?

Select the certification status.

To confirm that the material meets industry standards and specifications.
26
What is the pass rate for material inspections (in percentage)?

Enter a percentage value.

To evaluate the quality of materials received based on inspection results.
Min: 0
Target: 98
Max: 100
27
Describe the procedures for material traceability used in the laboratory.

Provide a detailed description of traceability procedures.

To ensure materials can be traced back to their origin and verify quality.
28
When was the last audit of material quality conducted?

Select the date of the last audit.

To ensure that a quality audit of materials is done regularly.
29
Is there a process for handling non-conforming materials?

Select the status of the non-conformance handling process.

To confirm that there are procedures in place to manage materials that do not meet specifications.
30
Provide feedback received from suppliers regarding materials provided.

Enter any relevant feedback.

To document qualitative feedback from suppliers that may impact material quality.

FAQs

Evaluating test laboratories is crucial because it ensures that the facilities responsible for detecting and analyzing potential counterfeit parts have the necessary expertise, equipment, and procedures to provide accurate and reliable results, which is fundamental to effective counterfeit prevention.

The checklist covers areas such as laboratory accreditation, technical competence of personnel, testing equipment calibration and maintenance, test method validation, quality management systems, and reporting procedures.

Initial evaluations should be conducted before engaging a new laboratory, with follow-up assessments performed annually or more frequently if there are significant changes in the laboratory's operations, personnel, or equipment.

The evaluation process should involve quality assurance managers, technical experts familiar with counterfeit detection methods, and procurement specialists. In some cases, third-party auditors with specific expertise in laboratory assessment may also be engaged.

This checklist includes items to verify the laboratory's proficiency testing participation, inter-laboratory comparison results, internal quality control procedures, and the traceability of measurements to national or international standards, all of which contribute to result reliability.

Benefits

Ensures selection of qualified and capable test laboratories

Enhances reliability of counterfeit detection and analysis results

Supports compliance with SAE AS5553 laboratory requirements

Reduces risks associated with undetected counterfeit parts

Improves overall quality assurance in the supply chain