Single logo
LoginSign Up

Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) Project Audit Checklist

A comprehensive checklist to audit the implementation of Design for Six Sigma principles in product development projects, ensuring quality-driven design and robust product performance.

Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) Project Audit Checklist

by: audit-now
4.2

Get Template

About This Checklist

The Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) Project Audit Checklist is an essential tool for manufacturing companies implementing Six Sigma methodologies in their product development processes. This comprehensive checklist evaluates the application of DFSS principles throughout the design lifecycle, ensuring that quality is built into products from conception. By systematically assessing each phase of the DFSS process, organizations can minimize defects, optimize performance, and enhance customer satisfaction. This checklist is designed to validate the use of advanced design tools, statistical methods, and customer-focused approaches in creating robust and high-quality products.

Learn more

Industry

Manufacturing

Standard

Six Sigma

Workspaces

Laboratories

Occupations

Design Engineer
Six Sigma Master Black Belt
Product Development Manager
Quality Assurance Specialist
Research and Development Engineer
1
What is the identifier for the DFSS project being evaluated?

Enter the project identifier.

To uniquely identify the project during the audit.
2
What is the target customer satisfaction score for the product?

Enter the target score (1-5).

To evaluate if the design meets customer expectations.
Min: 1
Target: 4
Max: 5
3
Is the project compliant with the Design for Six Sigma methodology?
To assess adherence to the DFSS standards.
4
What suggestions do you have for improving the product design?

Provide your suggestions for design improvements.

To gather feedback for future enhancements.
5
When was the last review of the design documentation conducted?

Select the date of the last review.

To ensure that the design documentation is regularly reviewed.
6
What version of the design document is currently being used?

Enter the version of the design document.

To verify that the most recent design document is being utilized.
7
Have all key stakeholders been engaged in the design process?

Indicate whether stakeholder engagement has occurred.

To ensure that stakeholder input is incorporated into the design.
8
What is the measured cost of quality for the current design?

Enter the cost of quality in your currency.

To evaluate the financial impact of quality on the design.
Min: 0
Target: 5000
Max: 100000
9
What is the current risk assessment level for the design?
To assess the potential risks associated with the design.
10
What challenges were encountered during the design process?

Describe the challenges faced during the design process.

To identify and document obstacles faced in the design phase.
11
Who is the lead for the design team on this project?

Enter the name of the design team lead.

To identify the main point of contact for the design team.
12
What is the start date of the design phase?

Select the start date of the design phase.

To track the timeline of the design process.
13
How many iterations have been completed in the design process?

Enter the number of design iterations completed.

To assess the thoroughness of the design development.
Min: 1
Target: 3
Max: 20
14
What was the outcome of the most recent design review?
To evaluate the effectiveness of the design review process.
15
What feedback has been received from customers regarding the design?

Provide a summary of customer feedback.

To understand customer perceptions and feedback on the design.
16
Who is the lead for quality assurance on this design project?

Enter the name of the quality assurance lead.

To identify the primary contact responsible for quality assurance.
17
When was the last quality review conducted on the design?

Select the date of the last quality review.

To ensure that regular quality reviews are performed.
18
How many defects were identified during the last review?

Enter the total number of defects identified.

To track the quality of the design and identify areas for improvement.
Min: 0
Target: 2
Max: 100
19
What is the status of the corrective actions taken for identified defects?
To verify that corrective actions are being implemented effectively.
20
What lessons have been learned from this design project?

Provide a summary of lessons learned.

To capture insights for continuous improvement and future projects.
21
What methodology is being used for design verification?

Describe the verification methodology.

To understand the approach taken for verifying the design's effectiveness.
22
When was the design verification completed?

Select the date when verification was completed.

To track the timeline of the verification process.
23
What is the success rate of the design verification process?

Enter the success rate as a percentage.

To assess the effectiveness of the design verification.
Min: 0
Target: 95
Max: 100
24
Does the design comply with all specified requirements?
To ensure that the design meets the required specifications.
25
What recommendations do you have for improving the design verification process?

Provide your recommendations for improvement.

To gather insights for enhancing future verification efforts.

FAQs

The main purpose is to assess and improve the implementation of Design for Six Sigma principles in product development projects, ensuring quality is built into products from the design phase.

DFSS project audits should be conducted at key milestones throughout the product development lifecycle, typically at the end of each DFSS phase (Define, Measure, Analyze, Design, Verify).

The audit should involve DFSS project leaders, design engineers, quality assurance specialists, marketing representatives, and key stakeholders from various departments involved in the product development process.

The checklist evaluates areas such as voice of customer analysis, critical-to-quality (CTQ) characteristic identification, design of experiments (DOE), failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), and robust design principles implementation.

By ensuring proper implementation of DFSS principles, the audit helps create more reliable and high-performance products, reduce development costs, minimize post-launch issues, and ultimately lead to increased customer satisfaction and market success.

Benefits of Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) Project Audit Checklist

Ensures consistent application of DFSS principles across all product development projects

Identifies potential design flaws and quality issues early in the development process

Reduces time-to-market by minimizing redesigns and rework

Enhances product reliability and performance through data-driven design decisions

Improves alignment between product features and customer requirements