Single logo
LoginSign Up

DO-178C Software Verification Process Audit Checklist

A comprehensive checklist for auditing the software verification process in accordance with DO-178C guidelines for aerospace and defense software development.

DO-178C Software Verification Process Audit Checklist

by: audit-now
4.2

Get Template

About This Checklist

The DO-178C Software Verification Process Audit Checklist is an essential tool for ensuring compliance with the stringent safety-critical software development standards in the aerospace and defense industry. This comprehensive checklist addresses the key aspects of software verification as outlined in the DO-178C guidelines, helping organizations identify potential gaps in their processes, mitigate risks, and enhance the overall quality and reliability of their avionics software. By systematically evaluating each phase of the software verification process, from requirements analysis to final testing, this checklist enables auditors and quality assurance professionals to maintain the highest levels of safety and integrity in aerospace software development.

Learn more

Industry

Aerospace and Defense

Standard

DO-178C - Software Considerations in Airborne Systems

Workspaces

Software Development Laboratory

Occupations

Software Quality Assurance Specialist
Avionics Systems Engineer
Software Safety Engineer
Certification Specialist
Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) Engineer
1
Are all software requirements documented and traceable?

Select compliance status.

To ensure that all requirements are properly defined and can be traced through the development lifecycle.
2
What is the percentage of verification coverage achieved?

Enter coverage percentage.

To measure the extent to which the software has been verified against requirements.
Min: 0
Target: 100
Max: 100
3
Have the test cases been reviewed for completeness?

Select review status.

To ensure that test cases adequately cover all functional requirements.
4
List any non-conformance reports identified during verification.

Provide details of non-conformance reports.

To document any issues that could impact software quality and compliance.
5
What is the start date of the software verification process?

Select the start date.

To establish a timeline for the verification activities.
6
Describe the methodologies used for software verification.

Provide a detailed description of the methodologies.

To understand the approaches taken to verify the software and ensure they align with industry best practices.
7
What is the current status of defect resolution?

Select the defect resolution status.

To assess whether identified defects have been addressed appropriately.
8
How many hours were spent on the verification process?

Enter total hours spent.

To evaluate the resource allocation and effort involved in the verification activities.
Min: 0
Target: 40
Max: 500
9
Has the code review process been completed for all modules?

Select the code review completion status.

To ensure that all code modules have undergone a thorough review for quality and compliance.
10
What key issues were identified during the verification process?

List any key issues identified.

To record significant findings that could affect software performance and compliance.
11
What percentage of tests are automated?

Enter the percentage of automated tests.

To evaluate the extent of automation in the testing process, which can improve efficiency.
Min: 0
Target: 75
Max: 100
12
What is the date of the final verification review?

Select the date of the final review.

To track when the last review occurred, ensuring timely compliance assessments.
13
Have all stakeholders approved the verification results?

Select the approval status.

To verify that all key stakeholders are in agreement with the verification findings, ensuring alignment.
14
What lessons were learned during the software verification process?

Describe the lessons learned.

To capture insights that can improve future verification efforts and processes.
15
What is the defect density (defects per KLOC) found during verification?

Enter the defect density.

To assess the quality of the software by measuring the number of defects relative to the size of the codebase.
Min: 0
Target: 5
Max: 100
16
When is the next scheduled review of the verification process?

Select the date for the next review.

To ensure continuous improvement by planning future evaluations.
17
Is there an approved risk management plan in place for the verification process?

Select the status of the risk management plan.

To ensure that potential risks have been identified and managed appropriately.
18
How many risks have been identified during the verification process?

Enter the number of identified risks.

To quantify the risks associated with the verification activities for further analysis.
Min: 0
Target: 10
Max: 100
19
What mitigation strategies are in place for identified risks?

Describe the mitigation strategies.

To document the approaches taken to reduce the impact of identified risks.
20
What is the overall risk impact assessment for the verification process?

Select the overall risk impact level.

To evaluate the potential impact of risks on the verification process and project outcomes.

FAQs

The primary purpose is to ensure compliance with DO-178C guidelines for software verification in aerospace and defense applications, helping to maintain high safety and quality standards in avionics software development.

The frequency of audits may vary depending on project complexity and organizational policies, but it is generally recommended to conduct these audits at key milestones throughout the software development lifecycle and at least annually for ongoing projects.

The audit should involve software quality assurance specialists, avionics systems engineers, software developers, and independent verification and validation (IV&V) team members to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of the verification process.

The checklist covers areas such as requirements-based testing, structural coverage analysis, software review and analysis processes, tool qualification, and traceability between requirements, design, and test cases.

By ensuring thorough verification of safety-critical software, the checklist helps identify and address potential software defects early in the development process, ultimately contributing to the overall safety and reliability of aircraft systems.

Benefits

Ensures compliance with DO-178C software verification requirements

Identifies potential gaps in the software verification process

Enhances safety and reliability of avionics software

Streamlines the audit process for aerospace software development

Facilitates continuous improvement in software quality assurance practices