EASA Part-M Subpart G CAMO Quality System Audit Checklist

A comprehensive audit checklist for evaluating the compliance and effectiveness of Continuing Airworthiness Management Organizations' (CAMOs) quality systems under EASA Part-M Subpart G regulations in the aviation industry.

Get Template

About This Checklist

The EASA Part-M Subpart G CAMO Quality System Audit Checklist is a vital tool for assessing the effectiveness and compliance of Continuing Airworthiness Management Organizations (CAMOs) in the aviation industry. This comprehensive checklist is designed to evaluate the quality management system, procedures, and practices of CAMOs as per European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Part-M Subpart G regulations. By thoroughly examining the organization's quality assurance processes, internal audit procedures, and corrective action mechanisms, this checklist helps ensure regulatory compliance, enhance operational efficiency, and maintain the highest standards of safety in continuing airworthiness management.

Learn more

Industry

Aerospace and Defense

Standard

EASA Part-M - Continuing Airworthiness

Workspaces

CAMO Office
Quality Management Department
Office Buildings

Occupations

Quality Manager
Compliance Monitoring Manager
CAMO Auditor
Aviation Quality Assurance Specialist
Continuing Airworthiness Manager
1
Is the Quality Management System compliant with EASA Part-M requirements?
2
What comments do you have regarding the document review process?
3
How many non-conformances were identified during the audit?
Min0
Target0
Max100
4
Was the audit frequency compliant with the established schedule?
5
How effective were the corrective actions taken for previous non-conformances?
6
What is the percentage of employees who completed the required training?
Min0
Target100
Max100
7
When was the last internal audit conducted?
8
What opportunities for improvement have been identified during the audit?
9
Are all safety procedures being followed as per the established guidelines?
10
What quality metrics were reviewed during this audit?
11
What was the deficiency rate identified during the audit?
Min0
Target0
Max100
12
When is the next internal audit scheduled?
13
Have the improvement initiatives identified in the last audit been implemented?
14
What feedback have you received from employees regarding the quality system?
15
What is the average resolution time for audit findings?
Min0
Target30
Max90
16
When was the last review of quality objectives conducted?
17
Is there a process in place to ensure adherence to the latest regulatory updates?
18
What training has been provided to staff regarding recent regulatory changes?
19
How often are regulatory compliance audits conducted?
Min1
Target12
Max12
20
When was the last regulatory compliance audit performed?

FAQs

The main objective is to assess and ensure the compliance and effectiveness of a CAMO's quality system with EASA Part-M Subpart G regulations, focusing on internal audit processes, quality assurance, and continuous improvement.

Audits using this checklist should be conducted by qualified quality managers, independent auditors, or compliance monitoring managers within the CAMO or external aviation auditing professionals.

The checklist covers areas such as quality policy, internal audit procedures, management of findings, corrective action processes, management review, and continuous monitoring of compliance with applicable requirements.

By ensuring a robust quality system within CAMOs, this checklist helps maintain high standards of continuing airworthiness management, thereby enhancing overall aircraft safety and reliability.

A comprehensive CAMO quality system audit should be performed at least annually, with more frequent partial audits or reviews conducted based on the organization's size, complexity, and risk assessment.

Benefits of EASA Part-M Subpart G CAMO Quality System Audit Checklist

Ensures compliance with EASA Part-M Subpart G quality system requirements

Improves the effectiveness of CAMO internal audit processes

Enhances the identification and resolution of non-conformities

Supports continuous improvement in continuing airworthiness management

Strengthens overall safety culture within the organization