Single logo

FSSC 22000 Environmental Monitoring Program (EMP) Audit Checklist

A comprehensive checklist for auditing Environmental Monitoring Programs (EMPs) within the FSSC 22000 framework, focusing on assessing the design, implementation, and effectiveness of microbial monitoring practices in food production environments to prevent contamination and ensure food safety.

FSSC 22000 Environmental Monitoring Program (EMP) Audit Checklist
by: audit-now
4.8

Get Template

About This Checklist

The FSSC 22000 Environmental Monitoring Program (EMP) Audit Checklist is an essential tool for food and beverage companies aiming to maintain the highest standards of hygiene and prevent microbial contamination in their production environments. This specialized checklist focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of environmental monitoring practices within the FSSC 22000 framework. By systematically assessing sampling procedures, testing methods, and corrective action protocols, organizations can ensure their EMPs are robust, scientifically valid, and compliant with FSSC 22000 requirements. Regular use of this checklist helps companies identify potential sources of contamination, validate cleaning and sanitation procedures, and demonstrate their commitment to producing safe, high-quality food products.

Learn more

Industry

Food and Beverage

Standard

FSSC 22000

Workspaces

Food Processing Facility

Occupations

Quality Assurance Manager
Food Safety Microbiologist
Sanitation Supervisor
Production Manager
Laboratory Technician

Environmental Monitoring Program Audit

(0 / 5)

1
Describe any corrective actions taken following the last EMP audit.

Provide detailed descriptions of the actions taken.

To ensure that appropriate measures are implemented to address any identified issues.
Write something awesome...
2
Is the EMP sampling frequency compliant with FSSC 22000 standards?

Select the appropriate response.

To ensure that the sampling frequency aligns with established food safety standards.
3
Provide any notes regarding pathogen detection during EMP.

Enter your notes here.

To document any specific incidents or observations related to pathogen detection.
4
What is the sanitation verification score from the last inspection?

Enter a score from 1 to 5.

To quantify sanitation compliance within the food processing environment.
Min: 1
Target: 5
Max: 5
5
Was microbial contamination detected in the last EMP sampling?

Select the appropriate response.

To assess the effectiveness of the microbial control measures in place.
6
What recommendations do you have for improving the EMP?

Provide your recommendations here.

To gather insights and suggestions to enhance the effectiveness of the EMP.
Write something awesome...
7
Are all employees trained on the EMP procedures?

Select the appropriate response.

To ensure that all staff are knowledgeable about the EMP and its requirements.
8
How many non-compliance incidents were reported in the last year?

Enter the number of incidents.

To evaluate the frequency of non-compliance and identify trends over time.
Min: 0
Target: 0
Max: 100
9
Is the documentation for the EMP available for review?

Indicate whether the documentation is available.

To verify that all necessary documentation is accessible and up-to-date.
10
When was the last review of the Environmental Monitoring Program conducted?

Select the date of the last review.

To track the frequency of EMP reviews and ensure they are performed timely.
11
Describe any actions taken to improve the EMP since the last audit.

Provide details of the improvement actions.

To document enhancements made to the program based on audit feedback.
Write something awesome...
12
When is the next scheduled audit of the Environmental Monitoring Program?

Select the date for the next audit.

To keep track of upcoming audits and ensure they are planned in advance.
13
What were the key observations from the last EMP audit?

Provide observations here.

To document significant findings and ensure they are addressed in future actions.
14
What is the average time taken to implement corrective actions after issues are identified?

Enter the average time in days.

To measure the responsiveness of corrective actions in addressing identified risks.
Min: 0
Target: 3
Max: 30
15
Is the sampling method used compliant with FSSC 22000 requirements?

Select the appropriate response.

To ensure that the sampling methods align with industry standards for food safety.
16
When was the last update made to the EMP procedures?

Select the date of the last update.

To ensure that the procedures are current and reflect the latest standards.
17
What feedback have employees provided regarding the EMP processes?

Provide employee feedback here.

To gather insights from employees to improve the EMP.
Write something awesome...
18
Is the environmental sampling frequency adequate as per the established guidelines?

Select the appropriate response.

To assess whether the sampling frequency meets regulatory requirements.
19
How often is staff training on EMP conducted?

Enter the frequency in months.

To evaluate the frequency of training and ensure staff are kept up-to-date.
Min: 1
Target: 6
Max: 12
20
Has a risk assessment been conducted for the EMP processes?

Indicate whether a risk assessment has been conducted.

To ensure that potential risks are identified and evaluated regularly.
21
Are there any pending corrective actions from the last audit?

Indicate whether there are pending corrective actions.

To track outstanding corrective actions that need to be addressed.
22
When is the next scheduled review of the EMP planned?

Select the date for the next review.

To ensure that the EMP is reviewed regularly and updated as necessary.
23
Provide a summary of findings from the last EMP evaluation.

Summarize your findings here.

To document key observations and outcomes from the evaluation process.
Write something awesome...
24
How many samples have been taken as part of the EMP in the last year?

Enter the total number of samples taken.

To assess the volume of sampling conducted and ensure adequate monitoring.
Min: 0
Target: 150
Max: 1000
25
Is the EMP compliant with all applicable regulatory standards?

Select the appropriate response.

To ensure that the EMP adheres to all relevant regulations and guidelines.

FAQs

Key components include site-specific risk assessment, sampling plan design, selection of target organisms, testing methods, data analysis, trend monitoring, and corrective action procedures.

EMP audits should be conducted at least annually, with more frequent reviews (e.g., quarterly) of monitoring data and trends to ensure ongoing program effectiveness.

The audit should involve quality assurance managers, microbiologists, sanitation supervisors, production managers, and laboratory personnel responsible for sample analysis.

The checklist covers the risk-based approach to selecting sampling sites, including both food contact and non-food contact surfaces, and determining appropriate sampling frequencies based on product and process risks.

The checklist assesses the adequacy of corrective action procedures, including root cause analysis, implementation of remedial measures, and verification of their effectiveness in response to out-of-specification environmental monitoring results.

Benefits

Ensures comprehensive coverage of environmental monitoring requirements

Helps identify and mitigate microbial risks in the production environment

Validates the effectiveness of sanitation programs

Supports early detection of potential food safety issues

Enhances compliance with FSSC 22000 and regulatory standards