Single logo
LoginSign Up

ISO 9001 Automotive Ergonomics and Human Factors Audit Checklist

A comprehensive checklist for auditing and improving ergonomics and human factors integration in automotive design and development, ensuring compliance with ISO 9001 standards and industry-specific best practices.

ISO 9001 Automotive Ergonomics and Human Factors Audit Checklist

by: audit-now
4.4

Get Template

About This Checklist

In the competitive automotive industry, vehicle ergonomics and human factors play a crucial role in user satisfaction, safety, and overall product quality. This ISO 9001 Automotive Ergonomics and Human Factors Audit Checklist is designed to ensure that automotive manufacturers integrate ergonomic principles and human-centered design throughout the vehicle development process. By systematically evaluating aspects such as driver comfort, control accessibility, visibility, and cognitive load, this checklist helps manufacturers create vehicles that are not only compliant with ISO 9001 quality standards but also optimized for human use and interaction. Regular implementation of this tool can lead to improved user experience, enhanced safety features, reduced driver fatigue, and increased customer satisfaction in the evolving automotive market.

Learn more

Industry

Automotive

Standard

ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems

Workspaces

and prototype evaluation facilities
Automotive Design Centers
Testing Facilities

Occupations

Ergonomics Specialist
Human Factors Engineer
Industrial Designer
User Experience Researcher
Automotive Safety Engineer
1
Is the vehicle design compliant with ergonomic standards?

Select the compliance status based on the ergonomic evaluation.

To ensure that the vehicle design meets ergonomic requirements for user comfort and safety.
2
What is the adjustable range of the driver's seat in centimeters?

Enter the adjustable range of the driver's seat.

To evaluate if the seat adjustment accommodates a wide range of user body sizes.
Min: 30
Target: 50
Max: 70
3
What feedback did test users provide regarding driver comfort?

Please provide detailed feedback from test users about driver comfort.

User feedback is essential for understanding comfort and usability issues.
4
How would you rate the usability of the human-machine interface?

Rate the usability of the human-machine interface from 1 to 5.

To assess the effectiveness of the interface in providing a user-friendly experience.
5
Do all airbags deploy correctly during testing?

Indicate whether all airbags deployed correctly during the testing.

To ensure that the airbag system functions properly, which is critical for passenger safety.
6
What is the braking distance from 60 km/h to a complete stop in meters?

Enter the measured braking distance.

To evaluate the effectiveness of the vehicle's braking system in emergency situations.
Min: 15
Target: 25
Max: 30
7
How would you rate the visibility conditions during the test drive?

Rate the visibility conditions experienced during the test drive.

To assess how visibility impacts overall vehicle safety and driver performance.
8
What feedback did test drivers provide regarding emergency handling?

Please provide detailed feedback from test drivers about emergency handling.

Understanding driver feedback on emergency handling can reveal important safety issues.
9
What feedback did users provide regarding the aesthetics of the vehicle design?

Please provide detailed feedback from users about the design aesthetics.

User opinion on aesthetics can significantly influence overall satisfaction and acceptance of the vehicle.
10
How would you rate the overall interaction experience with the vehicle controls?

Rate the interaction experience with the vehicle controls from 1 to 5.

To determine if the controls are intuitive and user-friendly, which is crucial for user satisfaction.
11
On a scale of 1 to 10, how accessible is the vehicle for users with disabilities?

Provide an accessibility score from 1 (least accessible) to 10 (most accessible).

To evaluate how well the vehicle accommodates users with varying abilities.
Min: 1
Target: 8
Max: 10
12
Are users satisfied with the layout of vehicle controls?

Indicate whether users are satisfied with the layout of vehicle controls.

To understand if the control layout meets user expectations and enhances their experience.
13
How would you rate the cognitive load experienced by users while operating the vehicle?

Rate the cognitive load from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high).

To assess whether the vehicle's operation is mentally taxing, which can affect driver performance.
14
What sources of distraction were identified during the test drive?

List the sources of distraction encountered during the test drive.

Identifying distractions can help improve the design for safer driving experiences.
15
What is the average response time of the driver to critical alerts in milliseconds?

Enter the average response time to critical alerts.

To evaluate how quickly drivers can react to important notifications, which is critical for safety.
Min: 300
Target: 500
Max: 700
16
Do users find the control design intuitive?

Indicate whether users find the control design intuitive.

To determine if the control layout aligns with user expectations and cognitive processing.
17
What is the headroom clearance for the driver in centimeters?

Enter the measured headroom clearance for the driver.

To ensure that the vehicle interior accommodates users of varying heights, promoting comfort and safety.
Min: 90
Target: 100
Max: 120
18
How would you rate the comfort of the driver's seat?

Rate the driver's seat comfort from 1 to 5.

To assess seat comfort, which is essential for long-duration driving.
19
What feedback did users provide regarding the adjustability of the seating position?

Please provide detailed feedback from users about the seating adjustability.

User feedback on adjustability can highlight areas for improvement in ergonomic design.
20
Are the foot pedals easily accessible for all user sizes?

Indicate whether the foot pedals are easily accessible.

To evaluate if the foot pedals are designed for a wide range of user heights and leg lengths.

FAQs

The checklist covers areas such as seating comfort and adjustability, control panel layout and accessibility, visibility and sight lines, ingress and egress ease, human-machine interface design, cognitive ergonomics, anthropometric considerations, and adaptive technologies for diverse user groups.

Comprehensive audits should be conducted at key milestones throughout the vehicle development process, typically at the concept, prototype, and pre-production stages. Continuous evaluation and user testing should also be integrated into the design workflow.

The audit team should include ergonomics specialists, human factors engineers, industrial designers, safety engineers, user experience researchers, and representatives from various engineering disciplines. Input from diverse user groups through usability testing is also crucial.

By providing a structured approach to evaluating all aspects of human interaction with the vehicle, this checklist helps identify potential ergonomic issues, ensures comprehensive consideration of user needs, and promotes design solutions that enhance comfort, safety, and usability for a wide range of users.

Poor ergonomics can lead to user discomfort, increased driver fatigue, reduced safety due to distraction or misuse of controls, negative user reviews, decreased brand loyalty, and potential regulatory issues related to safety and accessibility standards in the automotive industry.

Benefits

Ensures compliance with ISO 9001 standards in the context of automotive ergonomics and human factors

Helps identify and address potential ergonomic issues early in the vehicle design process

Facilitates the integration of user-centered design principles in vehicle development

Supports the creation of safer, more comfortable, and user-friendly vehicles

Enhances overall product quality and customer satisfaction through improved ergonomics