Medical Device Usability Engineering Audit Checklist

A comprehensive checklist for auditing usability engineering processes in medical device development, ensuring compliance with ISO 13485 and IEC 62366 standards and improving overall device safety and user experience.

Get Template

About This Checklist

The Medical Device Usability Engineering Audit Checklist is a vital tool for healthcare organizations to ensure compliance with ISO 13485 and IEC 62366 standards in human factors and usability engineering processes. This comprehensive checklist addresses critical aspects of user-centered design, usability testing, and user interface evaluation for medical devices. By implementing robust usability engineering practices, manufacturers can significantly reduce use errors, enhance user experience, and improve overall device safety. This checklist aids in systematically evaluating user needs analysis, usability specifications, formative and summative usability testing, and user interface design, ultimately contributing to the development of more intuitive and safer medical devices in the healthcare industry.

Learn more

Industry

Healthcare

Standard

Medical Device Usability Standards

Workspaces

Medical Device Manufacturing Facilities

Occupations

Human Factors Specialist
User Experience Designer
Clinical Applications Specialist
Quality Assurance Manager
Regulatory Affairs Specialist
1
Is the user-centered design process being adhered to throughout the development of the medical device?

Select the compliance status.

Ensuring compliance with user-centered design principles is critical for usability.
2
What is the overall score from the usability testing conducted on the medical device?

Provide the usability testing score.

Quantifying usability testing results helps assess the device's user-friendliness.
Min1
Target4
Max5
3
Please provide a summary of the feedback received from users during the usability testing.

Enter a detailed summary of user feedback.

User feedback is essential for identifying areas for improvement in design and functionality.
4
Has a human factors evaluation been conducted as part of the usability engineering process?

Select the evaluation status.

A human factors evaluation is crucial for ensuring the medical device meets user needs.
5
What notes or comments do you have regarding regulatory compliance related to usability?

Enter any relevant notes regarding regulatory compliance.

Documenting compliance notes is essential for tracking usability engineering adherence to standards.
6
Does the user interface design comply with the guidelines set forth in ISO 13485 and IEC 62366?

Select the compliance status.

Compliance with design guidelines is critical to ensure safety and effectiveness of the medical device.
7
What was the error rate observed during user interface testing?

Enter the error rate as a percentage.

Monitoring the error rate helps in assessing the usability and effectiveness of the interface.
Min0
Target5
Max100
8
What suggestions do users have for improving the user interface design?

Provide detailed suggestions from users.

User suggestions can provide valuable insights into potential improvements in the interface.
9
How satisfied are users with the user interface of the medical device?

Select the level of user satisfaction.

User satisfaction is a key indicator of usability and overall experience.
10
What specific issues were identified during the user interface evaluation?

List any issues identified during the evaluation.

Documenting issues helps in tracking and resolving usability problems effectively.
11
Has a comprehensive human factors analysis been completed for the medical device?

Select the completion status.

Completing a human factors analysis is essential to identify and mitigate usability risks.
12
What is the severity rating of identified usability risks on a scale from 1 to 10?

Enter the severity rating for identified risks.

Rating severity helps prioritize usability issues that need immediate attention.
Min1
Target5
Max10
13
What strategies have been implemented to mitigate identified usability risks?

Provide detailed descriptions of mitigation strategies.

Documenting mitigation strategies is crucial for tracking risk management efforts.
14
Has user training been provided to address usability concerns?

Select the training status.

User training is often necessary to ensure safe and effective use of medical devices.
15
What feedback has been received from regulatory bodies regarding usability?

Enter any relevant feedback from regulatory agencies.

Understanding regulatory feedback is essential for compliance and improvement.
16
Have the predefined usability goals for the medical device been achieved?

Select the achievement status.

Assessing the achievement of usability goals is critical to determine the success of the design.
17
What is the task completion rate observed during usability testing?

Enter the task completion rate as a percentage.

Measuring task completion rate helps evaluate the effectiveness of the user interface.
Min0
Target90
Max100
18
What observations were made during the usability testing sessions?

Provide detailed observations from testing.

Documenting observations provides insights into user interactions and potential issues.
19
What was the error identification rate during the usability evaluations?

Select the error identification rate.

Understanding how many errors were identified is essential for assessing usability.
20
What recommendations do you have for improving the usability of the device?

Provide recommendations for usability improvements.

User recommendations can guide future design iterations and enhancements.
21
Have accessibility features been implemented in the medical device design?

Select the implementation status.

Ensuring accessibility is critical for users with disabilities to safely operate the device.
22
What is the score from the accessibility compliance evaluation on a scale of 1 to 10?

Enter the accessibility compliance score.

A compliance score helps gauge how well the device meets accessibility standards.
Min1
Target7
Max10
23
What feedback have users provided regarding the accessibility of the device?

Provide detailed user feedback on accessibility.

User feedback is essential for understanding the effectiveness of accessibility features.
24
Was usability testing conducted with a diverse group of users, including those with disabilities?

Select the testing status.

Diverse user testing is important to evaluate the device's usability across various populations.
25
What barriers to accessibility have been identified in the device?

List any identified barriers to accessibility.

Identifying barriers is essential for making necessary improvements to the design.

FAQs

The checklist covers areas such as user research, use environment analysis, task analysis, usability goals and objectives, user interface design principles, formative and summative usability testing, risk analysis related to use errors, and usability validation.

It includes specific items to verify that user needs are properly identified and addressed throughout the design process, usability testing is conducted rigorously, and potential use-related hazards are mitigated effectively.

The audit should involve human factors specialists, user experience designers, clinical experts, quality assurance personnel, and regulatory affairs professionals to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of usability aspects.

Usability engineering audits should be performed at key milestones during product development, before major design iterations, and as part of the final validation process before product release.

Inadequate usability engineering can lead to user errors, patient harm, device misuse, poor user adoption, increased training costs, regulatory non-compliance, and potential product recalls or liability issues.

Benefits

Ensures compliance with ISO 13485 and IEC 62366 usability engineering requirements

Reduces the risk of use errors and improves patient safety

Enhances user satisfaction and device adoption rates

Improves device efficiency and effectiveness in clinical settings

Facilitates regulatory approvals by demonstrating comprehensive usability considerations