Single logo
LoginSign Up

ISO 26262 Hardware Design Audit Checklist

A comprehensive checklist for auditing compliance with ISO 26262 Part 5 requirements in automotive hardware design, focusing on safety-critical aspects of hardware engineering

ISO 26262 Hardware Design Audit Checklist

by: audit-now
4.3

Get Template

About This Checklist

The ISO 26262 Hardware Design Audit Checklist is an indispensable tool for ensuring the safety and reliability of automotive hardware components. This comprehensive checklist addresses the specific requirements outlined in Part 5 of the ISO 26262 standard, which focuses on product development at the hardware level. By meticulously evaluating hardware design processes, failure mode analysis, and safety mechanisms, this checklist assists automotive hardware engineers and quality control teams in identifying potential vulnerabilities, ensuring robust design practices, and maintaining compliance with stringent safety standards. Implementing this checklist not only enhances the overall quality of automotive hardware but also contributes to the development of safer, more dependable vehicles while minimizing the risk of costly recalls and potential liabilities.

Learn more

Industry

Automotive

Standard

ISO 26262 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles

Workspaces

Laboratories
Automotive Development Centers
Laboratories

Occupations

Automotive Hardware Engineer
Hardware Quality Assurance Specialist
Functional Safety Manager
Hardware Project Leader
Hardware Verification and Validation Engineer
1
What is the ASIL level assigned to the hardware design?

Select the ASIL level.

To determine the safety integrity requirements of the hardware.
2
Provide a description of the failure mode analysis performed.

Describe the failure mode analysis.

To assess the thoroughness of the failure mode analysis in identifying potential risks.
3
What is the percentage of diagnostic coverage achieved?

Enter the percentage of diagnostic coverage.

To evaluate the effectiveness of diagnostics in identifying faults.
Min: 0
Target: 100
Max: 100
4
Is the hardware validation complete?

Select the validation status.

To ensure that the hardware has been validated according to safety standards.
5
Summarize the results from hardware integration testing.

Provide a summary of the integration testing results.

To assess the success of integration of hardware components.
6
What verification method was used for the hardware design?

Select the verification method utilized.

To determine the adequacy of the verification methods in ensuring design integrity.
7
Summarize the results from the verification activities.

Provide a summary of the verification results.

To evaluate the outcomes of the verification processes conducted.
8
How many defects were identified during the verification process?

Enter the total number of defects found.

To gauge the effectiveness of the verification process in uncovering issues.
Min: 0
Target: 0
9
What was the completion date for the verification process?

Select the verification completion date.

To track the timeline of verification activities.
10
Are any follow-up actions required based on the verification results?

Select the follow-up actions required.

To determine the need for further action to address verification findings.
11
What methodology was used for the safety analysis?

Describe the safety analysis methodology used.

To understand the approach taken to analyze safety aspects of the hardware.
12
Is the safety analysis complete?

Select the completion status.

To verify the completion status of the safety analysis process.
13
How many potential risks were identified during the analysis?

Enter the number of potential risks identified.

To assess the thoroughness of the safety analysis in identifying risks.
Min: 0
Target: 0
14
List the risk mitigation strategies proposed.

Provide details of risk mitigation strategies.

To evaluate the planned actions for addressing identified risks.
15
What was the date of the last safety analysis conducted?

Select the date of the last safety analysis.

To ensure that safety analyses are performed regularly.
16
Which reliability testing standards were followed during the hardware design?

Select the applicable reliability testing standards.

To ensure compliance with established reliability testing protocols.
17
What is the calculated Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) for the hardware?

Enter the MTBF in hours.

To assess the reliability of the hardware design based on failure rates.
Min: 0
Target: 5000
18
Provide a summary of the reliability tests conducted.

Summarize the results of the reliability tests.

To evaluate the outcomes and effectiveness of the reliability testing performed.
19
What was the date of the last reliability test conducted?

Select the date of the last reliability test.

To ensure that reliability tests are up-to-date.
20
What actions are planned based on the reliability results?

Select the actions planned based on reliability results.

To determine necessary follow-up actions to improve hardware reliability.

FAQs

This checklist specifically addresses Part 5 of ISO 26262, which deals with product development at the hardware level for automotive systems.

The primary users are automotive hardware engineers, hardware quality assurance specialists, functional safety managers, and hardware project leaders involved in developing safety-critical automotive hardware components.

It helps ensure that hardware design processes adhere to safety standards, reducing the risk of hardware-related failures that could compromise vehicle safety and reliability.

The checklist covers hardware safety requirements, design principles, failure mode analysis, diagnostic coverage, hardware integration, and qualification of hardware components specific to automotive systems.

The audit should be conducted at critical stages of the hardware development lifecycle, including after requirements specification, design completion, prototype development, and before final production release.

Benefits of ISO 26262 Hardware Design Audit Checklist

Ensures compliance with ISO 26262 Part 5 hardware design requirements

Improves hardware reliability and safety in automotive systems

Facilitates early detection of potential hardware-related safety issues

Enhances traceability between hardware requirements and implementation

Supports comprehensive hardware failure mode analysis